Last updated August 2020


Clodes Solicitors (“we” or “us” or “our”) uses cookies and other tracking technologies when you visit our website (“the Site”), including any other media form and mobile website to help improve the performance, navigation and content with the aim of ultimately improving your experience.

You are encouraged to periodically review this Cookie Policy to stay informed of updates. You will be deemed to have been made aware of, will be subject to, and will be deemed to have accepted the changes in any revised Cookie Policy by your continued use of the Site after the date such revised Cookie Policy is posted.


We or UsClodes Solicitors whose head office is Regus House Malthouse Avenue, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RU.   Michael C Clode & Co and Clodes Solicitors are one and the same firm.
The SiteRefers to
Personal dataPersonal data is defined in the  General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.
CookieA string of information which assigns you a unique identifier that we store on your computer. Your browser then provides that unique identifier to use each time you submit a query to the Site.


We use cookies on the Site to, among other things, keep track of services you have used, track the pages you visit, see what navigational route you took to get there and what keywords you have used to find us. Using Google Analytics we are also able to identify some basic geographical data and information on the types of devices which are used by visitors to the website.

By collating and analysing this data we are able to understand how the Site is being used and improve your user experience.

We do not release this data to any third party. We do not use it for promotional purposes.


The following types of cookies may be used when you visit the Site:

Analytics Cookies

Analytics cookies monitor how users reached the Site, and how they interact with and move around once on the Site. These cookies assist with creating web statistics and let us know what features on the Site are working the best and what features on the Site can be improved.   The Site uses analytics services provided by Google. You do not have to allow us to use these Cookies


Before Cookies are placed on your computer or device, you will be shown a pop-up requesting your consent to set those Cookies. You may, if you wish, deny consent; however certain features of the Site may not function fully or as intended

Most browsers are set to accept cookies by default. However, you can remove or reject cookies in your browser’s settings. Please be aware that such action could affect the availability and functionality of the Site.

For more information on how to control cookies, check your browser or device’s settings for how you can control or reject cookies.


For more information about how we use information collected by cookies and other tracking technologies, please refer to our Privacy Policy posted on the Site. This Cookie Policy is part of and is incorporated into our Privacy Policy. By using the Site, you agree to be bound by this Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.


We reserve the right to make changes to this Cookie Policy at any time and for any reason. We will alert you about any changes by updating the “Last Updated” date of this Cookie Policy. Any changes or modifications will be effective immediately upon posting the updated Cookie Policy on the Site, and you waive the right to receive specific notice of each such change or modification.


If you have questions or comments about this Cookie Policy, please contact us at: 

Clodes Solicitors
Regus House
Malthouse Avenue
Cardiff Gate Business Park
CF23 8RU

Latest tweets

Clodes Solicitors
Clodes Solicitors
he principle of open justice is the starting point and its difficult to depart from.

In Various Claimants v Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, the Judge had the following to say -

"I refuse the Claimants' Application for anonymity (including being excused from the requirement to provide their addresses on the Claim Form) and reporting restrictions that would prevent their identification as Claimants in the action that they intend to bring. Neither of the reasons advanced in support of the application provides a sufficient basis for the grant of this derogation from the principle of open justice. The orders sought are not necessary either properly to maintain the administration of justice or to protect the legitimate interests of the Claimants. Less intrusive methods, that can be adopted in the proceedings, will properly protect those legitimate interests. The evidence in support of the Application is generalised, weak and falls a long way short of being clear and cogent".

Need to sell a co-owned property and one owner is refusing to sell? No problem contact us to resolve the matter on 02920765050 or click the link CLODESSOLICITOR photo

Is an executor behaving unreasonably, are they favouring a beneficiary or being hostile ? Maybe it’s time to consider removing the executor, for more information click the link CLODESSOLICITOR photo

‘Don’t do ADR on the cheap’ ​industry experts warn | News | Law Gazette